A direct response to player unrest
Professional tennis may have just hit a small but significant turning point. After weeks of tension over player pay, the four Grand Slam tournaments have decided to open a new channel for dialogue. On Thursday, Roland Garros, Wimbledon, the US Open and the Australian Open announced the creation of a “Players’ Advisory Council”.
On paper, the idea is straightforward. Give the main stakeholders more of a say in the conversations that shape the biggest events of the season. In reality, the move comes after a spell of highly public resistance.
Before Roland Garros, several players had voiced anger over how revenue from the Slams is shared. The issue took on another level when Aryna Sabalenka, then world No 1, raised the possibility of a boycott if nothing changed.
The message was clear: the tour’s biggest names no longer want to be consulted at arm’s length. They want a real say in the decisions.
Try it for $0.99.
Prize money at the heart of the talks
Money is, of course, the key issue behind this new body. Players have argued for months that their share of the revenue generated by the major tournaments needs to change. And this fight goes well beyond the headline figure paid out in round one or to the champion.
Behind prize money sit bigger issues: how income is split, working conditions, the calendar, player welfare and, more broadly, who actually runs tennis.
The new council is meant to give those topics a regular forum. The Slams say it will provide a platform for direct talks with players, especially on welfare and pay.
It is a way to calm things down, but also a recognition that carrying on as before was getting harder by the day.
Ben Shelton wants players to be heard
The move appears to have gone down well with some players. Ben Shelton, in particular, sounded keen to get involved in the new setup.
“As players, this gives us a real opportunity to have our voices heard,” the American said, seeing the council as a way to shape discussions that reach far beyond what happens on court.
That sums up the shift in tone pretty neatly. Players do not want to be just the faces on the court anymore. They want a hand in the decisions that define their profession.
For the organisers, the message has landed. Deborah Jevans, chair of the All England Club, acknowledged that players had made it clear they wanted to be listened to more, describing the new council as an “important step” towards a closer relationship between both sides.
Set to begin after the 2026 US Open
It will still be a while before the promise becomes reality. The advisory council will not officially be launched until after the 2026 US Open. Its make-up is also still to be decided, with the Slams saying they are currently in talks with interested players.
Applications will be open to those who want to be involved.
The big question now is how far this new body will actually go. Because the real test is not just putting everyone around the same table. It is deciding what can genuinely be done once they are there.
After boycott threats and blunt warnings from several leading names, the Grand Slams have chosen to extend an olive branch. It is now up to the players to see whether it leads to real change.
in your pocket.
Real-time notifications & alerts
Leave a Reply